Sander Spek, http://sander-s.net
Sander-S.net
a weblog about nothing in particular

Facebook communication

[ Mar 12th, 2008 ]

Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, gave a heavily discussed (e.g., [1], [2]) interview at the SXSW Interactive conference last week. You can watch a video summary here on Austin360.com.

I haven't read and watched much interviews with Zuckerberg before, but I noticed two things. Firstly, according to Zuckerberg, Facebook isn't there to create new communities, but rather to help existing ones communicate better. I don't know why this claim stood out. After all, that's all what I use Facebook for: to communicate with people I already know. But, even though I didn't really participate in it, others have always claimed that finding and making new contacts was an essential advantage of online social networks. Well now, I'm glad it isn't. Now I can refuse friend requests from people I don't know, while knowing I have the spirit of Zuckerberg with me.

markzuckerberg.jpg

Mark Zuckerberg. From Wikimedia Commons. GFDL.

The other point I noticed stood out for opposite reasons. Zuckerberg claims that Facebook makes communication with your contacts easier, allows you to stay in touch with more people, and also enrich the contacts with those people. I admit he is right on the first two points. But our communication getting enriched? I admit, seeing people's status messages and seeing what books they are reading does provide new conversation topics. And granted, I love Facebook to stay in touch with people who live far from me. But I have had several moments where I seriously considered removing all my contacts in my city, just because I felt our relationships shallowed so much since we befriended each other on Facebook. And when I wrote that in my status message I did get some agreeing responses.

Am I right in thinking that Facebook shallows my relationship with my close friends that live around the block? Or is it just some Pavlov reaction that I, and many others, seem to have in thinking that every social activity online is just a poor and depleted substitute of the real thing?

Categorised as sander, opinion, new media, web2.0.

2 Responses to “Facebook communication”

  1. on 18 Mar 2008 at 12:47 pm1knienke

    goede tekst spekkie. inhoudelijk geen mening omdat ik geen FaceBook-er ben. misschien zegt dat al genoeg, ik weet het niet :)

  2. on 25 Mar 2008 at 9:36 pm2Connorlu

    Great text.., guy

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Recent posts

  • Online and offline squatters
  • Ten typefaces to rule them all - part 2
  • Ten typefaces to rule them all - part 1
  • Muska
  • What I think Maastricht needs
  • Melt!, in retrospect
  • Stiltecoupé
  • ‘‘It's not even a secret, just the Robinson affair’’

Static pages

  • Connect
  • Photography
  • Tech publications
  • Presentation slides
  • Media exposure
  • About
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Blog: tag cloud
  • Blog: categories

Recent responses

  • Job: “Hello Sander, we would like to work with you to realise the points of action described above. Destruktief is inviting everybody who wants to contribute.”
  • Ten typefaces to rule them all - part 1, Sander S: “[...] Edit: part 2 [...]”
  • Ten typefaces to rule them all - part 2, Sander S: “[...] days ago I started publishing the first part of my list of 10 favorite typeface families. Today the second part, featuring the sans [...]”
  • Sander: “:)”
  • Stefan Hattenbach: “Sander it is, nothing else, sorry. Cheers”

RSS


RSS feed

Search

Twitter

    Colophon

    All contents of this site, as far as it's made by myself, Sander Spek, is released under a Creative Commons Attribution license. This mainly includes the texts and the featured photos. If in doubt, please contact me.

    The layout of this site was originally based on the Procut Wordpress Theme, designed by Komirad. By now, it has been unrecognisably edited. Once, when I have time, I'll release it as a Wordpress theme.

    The image on the left is an adaptation of Decorative Flourish, designed by Melissa Mathis.